Concordium’s CEO on The Future of Digital Identity Is Privacy and Programmable Money

by
Victoria d’Este

Printed: November 28, 2025 at 6:36 am Up to date: November 28, 2025 at 6:37 am

by Ana

Edited and fact-checked:
November 28, 2025 at 6:36 am

To enhance your local-language expertise, typically we make use of an auto-translation plugin. Please notice auto-translation is probably not correct, so learn original article for exact info.

What if you happen to may show your age on-line with out ever revealing your title, birthday, or ID? In an unique interview, Boris Bohrer‑Bilowitzki—CEO of Concordium—explains how the corporate’s blockchain platform leverages zero‑data proofs to embed digital identification straight on the protocol degree. This innovation permits privateness‑preserving verification and programmable cash, opening the door to a basically new digital paradigm. Bohrer‑Bilowitzki delves into how this know-how may redefine belief, streamline actual‑world interactions, and ship a safer, extra seamless digital expertise for on a regular basis customers.

Boris, are you able to please introduce your self and Concordium?

I’m Boris Bohrer‑Bilowitzki, CEO of Concordium. We function a layer‑1 blockchain distinguished by two core distinctive promoting propositions. First, identification is embedded straight into the bottom layer. This allows customers to work together inside the ecosystem in a completely privateness‑preserving method via zero‑data proofs.

On the opposite aspect, we have now what we name PLTs, protocol-level tokens, which permit issuance particularly geared towards stablecoins, enabling full programmability options. This delivers on the core promise of programmable cash, which then integrates with the ID in what we name “confirm and pay,” or the ID by itself in “confirm and entry.”

The objective isn’t to problem Ethereum or Solana—or any of the established gamers—in a head‑on battle. That will be futile, particularly within the DeFi area, the place the highest 70 tasks largely replicate each other. As a substitute, we’re centered on onboarding new customers by abstracting away the complexities of crypto. Our first step is privateness‑preserving age verification, which is already stay throughout a number of industries, as our latest bulletins exhibit.

Constructing on prime of that, with regard to the programmability options of protocol-level issuance, we summary away all of the dangers that sensible contracts inherently have after they fulfill a custodial operate. That’s how the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems are typically constructed. 

And I do know a factor or two about custody, since I used to be the founding accomplice, and nonetheless am the founding accomplice, and former Chief Business Officer of Copper, one of many largest custodians on this planet. The concept right here is that issuing on a protocol degree, somewhat than through sensible contracts, means that you can program sensible cash for transactions you do, whether or not in the true world or industries like playing, gaming, grownup content material, or any transaction to pay for content material.

Alternatively, for extra complicated transactions akin to commerce and finance, the place the time worth of cash is essential, it offers stablecoins, presently missing use instances within the type of tokenized cash market funds or any yield-bearing stablecoin, an precise objective. And that’s the undertaking.

How does Concordium embed digital ID on the protocol degree with out compromising consumer privateness?

That’s the core of all of it. Privateness is essential to us as a result of, on the finish of the day, you received’t get customers within the crypto world if you happen to don’t implement it in any respect. And if you happen to ignore compliance-related requirements with regard to ID, you received’t get regulators onboard.

Concordium’s method is that you just undergo a verification course of as soon as when coming into the ecosystem, completed by basic identification suppliers, like Notabene. Notabene certifies that the doc you current to onboard is legitimate. However right here’s the magical half: Concordium at no level has entry to the info; the chain doesn’t see it. What occurs is that the road gadgets of that identification are cryptographically hashed into an identification object tied to your pockets.

So, for instance, sometimes you’d see Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki, driver’s license, birthday, and many others., however when interacting in an ecosystem, you don’t need to reveal your title or actual doc. If we take age verification as a easy instance, the service provider solely must know if you happen to’re over 18. Utilizing zero-knowledge proofs, from a pockets that solely you management, you may show this with out ever exhibiting your private information. That’s how privateness is carried out.

If age verification could possibly be fully invisible, how would that change the Web for customers?

The best way folks presently work together on-line, they should undergo some onboarding course of in all places, which is ridiculous. The concept ought to be that you just don’t have to reveal your title or exercise simply to entry a service. Sure, you want compliance when proving age, and rightly so, particularly for kids and social media. However invisible age verification makes your life simpler, retains you non-public, and stays compliant.

It’s troublesome to implement this, significantly with zero-knowledge proofs and ecosystem interplay, however we’ve solved that.

Might Concordium’s method to identification verification develop into a world normal for privacy-first authentication?

Completely. It will depend on how far you need to take it. Age verification is a low-hanging fruit since your birthdate is on any government-issued doc. The secret is doing it as soon as, not a number of instances. Interplay afterward stays non-public.

We’re already experimenting with extra complicated KYC use instances. For instance, onboarding to banks requires greater than a driver’s license photograph. You might hash your identification to a pockets in a manner that means that you can open a checking account with one click on, scanning a QR code, with out repeatedly submitting paperwork. Layers exist behind this for KYC reliance, however the basis is there. So sure, this method may develop into an ordinary for privacy-first authentication globally.

How do you persuade regulators that privateness doesn’t imply loneliness?

Privateness will not be the identical as anonymity. Crypto typically emphasizes full anonymity, which regulators don’t settle for, forcing companies to repeat KYC checks. We convey our options to regulators, for instance, on age verification, together with retailers and cost service suppliers. They’ve given us the inexperienced mild, recognizing this as the perfect resolution they’ve seen.

It’s a step-by-step course of. Convincing regulators includes proving that laws are upheld. After years of lagging behind, regulators are embracing know-how that secures compliance whereas respecting privateness. For instance, the UK On-line Security Act is strict, and Ofcom ensures it’s enforced. Concordium’s resolution helps resolve these issues effectively, lowering consumer friction whereas satisfying regulatory necessities.

Might zero-knowledge proofs ultimately exchange conventional ID checks in all places, from banks to bars?

My brief reply is sure. Implementation is essential. For instance, bars and film theaters presently verify IDs manually. Banks do the identical with paper information. Over-regulation typically exists as a result of there’s no know-how to simplify it. Zero-knowledge proofs present privateness whereas satisfying regulators, enabling belief with out exposing private info. Sovereign identification plus privacy-preserving know-how is the way in which ahead, and regulators agree that they only want assurance that laws are being upheld.

How do you reply to critics who say blockchain-based identification is simply too complicated for on a regular basis customers?

I’m not shocked. Present implementations in Ethereum or comparable networks are dangerous. Complexity is usually misunderstood; the blockchain itself shouldn’t be seen, it ought to simply work. Trade contributors should make tooling simpler.

Explaining seed phrases or non-public keys to on a regular basis customers, like your aunt, is futile. That’s why folks lose entry to funds. Complexity could be solved. At Concordium, blockchain is invisible; customers arrange an ID in our app and work together with companies like age verification. Different performance follows.

The crypto ecosystem exhibits indicators of stagnation. With month-to-month dApp customers caught at 6–7 million, it’s clear that blockchain’s complexity has stored most customers at arm’s size. However folks already use complicated programs like finance with out absolutely understanding them. Blockchain can resolve these real-world issues. The secret is tooling and usefulness. Id options don’t should be complicated if the applying is intuitive.

Are there any inventive use instances for privacy-preserving IDs past age verification, like voting or social media?

Governance is one compelling instance. Think about identification‑based mostly voting programs the place privateness is preserved and a person’s stake within the ecosystem straight influences outcomes. In social media, privateness‑preserving identification verification may allow platforms to ship content material aligned with customers’ verified preferences—somewhat than counting on algorithmic manipulation. Past that, blockchain know-how unlocks solely new product classes beforehand deemed not possible, weaving a reliable basis for innovation.

What’s the most important trade-off between privateness and comfort in your system? How do you resolve it?

There may be all the time a trade-off. Even cypherpunks undergo KYC to entry stablecoins. Privateness doesn’t imply anonymity; it’s essential to confirm paperwork as soon as, and the info shouldn’t be shared throughout the ecosystem. Our system balances comfort and privateness: customers confirm as soon as, stay non-public, and regulators are happy. Overemphasizing anonymity prevents adoption and regulatory compliance. We skew towards comfort whereas preserving core privateness guarantees.

Might Concordium’s resolution redefine what it means to belief a web-based service?

Sure, and it already does. Belief stems from proving attributes—akin to age—with out revealing pointless private information. For example, when it’s essential to confirm the authenticity of on-line content material or interactions, Concordium permits trustless, privateness‑preserving proof. It constantly verifies attributes inside the ecosystem, redefining how we perceive belief within the digital world.

If Concordium succeeds, what tangible variations will the common web consumer expertise of their digital life?

Their expertise can be smoother and safer. Customers can work together on-line with out unnecessarily exposing private information. For example, in grownup content material situations, there’s no want to fret about AI age estimation or disclosing delicate private info. Concordium permits trustless interactions that confirm consumer attributes whereas preserving privateness, in the end making the web and digital life safer for everybody.

About The Writer

Victoria is a author on a wide range of know-how matters together with Web3.0, AI and cryptocurrencies. Her intensive expertise permits her to put in writing insightful articles for the broader viewers.

More articles

Victoria d’Este

•