Key Highlights
- RBI says cryptocurrencies don’t have any intrinsic worth, issuer or promise to pay, and are pushed purely by hypothesis.
- Stablecoins might weaken financial coverage, banking stability and result in dollarization, the RBI warns.
- India is pushing a sovereign-backed digital rupee (CBDC) as a safer different to non-public crypto.
The Reserve Financial institution of India (RBI) has reiterated its onerous line on personal cryptocurrencies, with Deputy Governor T. Rabi Sankar saying they can’t be handled as cash, foreign money and even real monetary belongings, however are basically speculative items of pc code.
Addressing the Mint Annual BFSI (Banking, Monetary Companies and Insurance coverage) Conclave 2025, Sankar cautioned that cryptocurrencies pose dangers to financial stability, fiscal coverage and the broader monetary system.
Crypto is just not cash, says RBI
Sankar mentioned cryptocurrencies fail to fulfill probably the most fundamental options of cash. “Cryptocurrencies don’t have any intrinsic worth. They don’t seem to be backed by a promise to pay, they usually don’t have any issuer. Their worth is only speculative,” he mentioned.
He explained that cash derives its credibility from sovereign backing and public belief in a recognised issuer equivalent to a central financial institution. “Foreign money or deposits carry a promise from a trusted issuer, and cash derives its credibility from the sovereign that backs its worth,” he mentioned, including that cryptocurrencies declare to redefine cash whereas representing no underlying worth in any respect.
In response to Sankar, cryptocurrencies equivalent to Bitcoin don’t generate any underlying money flows and due to this fact can’t be categorized as monetary belongings. They don’t seem to be even belongings, he remarked, describing crypto as “only a piece of code.”
‘Pure gamble’, not investing
On whether or not cryptocurrency buying and selling is corresponding to playing, the RBI deputy governor mentioned unbacked cryptocurrencies quantity to “pure gamble primarily based on mathematical bets.” He famous that merchants largely guess on value actions pushed by occasions or sentiment quite than fundamentals.
Drawing a historic parallel, Sankar likened the crypto growth to the tulip mania of the seventeenth century, the place costs had been fuelled totally by hypothesis.
His feedback come in opposition to the backdrop of India’s tightening stance on speculative digital actions. The Promotion and Regulation of On-line Gaming Act, 2025, enforced from October 1, 2025, led to a nationwide ban on real-money gaming functions, renewing debate over the character of crypto buying and selling.
Stablecoins lack fundamental attributes of cash
Sankar additionally mounted a robust critique of stablecoins — cryptocurrencies designed to keep up a secure worth, sometimes pegged to a fiat foreign money such because the US greenback.
Speaking on the BFSI conclave and later at a media interplay in Mumbai on December 12, 2025, he mentioned stablecoins don’t “seem to have” a promise to pay, which is a defining characteristic of sovereign foreign money.
“Stablecoins lack the fundamental attributes of cash, their benefits are neither distinctive nor unambiguous, and their dangers are all too actual,” Sankar mentioned.
Dangers to financial coverage and monetary stability
The deputy governor warned that widespread adoption of stablecoins might pose severe macro-financial dangers, together with foreign money substitution, dollarisation, and weakened monetary-policy transmission.
He mentioned stablecoins fail to fulfill the 2 defining options of recent cash — fiat standing and singleness. “It’s attainable that in a stablecoin system, there could be lots of, or extra, of currencies in an economic system, making any such system inherently unstable,” Sankar mentioned.
Stablecoins, he added, are in the end personal cash and don’t carry the sovereign backing that underpins belief in fiat currencies. He questioned whether or not they even represent a transparent legal responsibility of their issuers, noting that “neither of the 2 main cryptocurrencies in use right this moment makes such unconditional promise” to redeem at par.
Sankar cautioned that large-scale adoption might divert deposits away from banks, increase funding prices and improve reliance on central-bank liquidity, thereby weakening banking intermediation and growing systemic threat.
Claimed advantages ‘largely unproven’
Dismissing claims that stablecoins supply superior cost effectivity or monetary inclusion, Sankar mentioned such advantages stay largely unproven.
India’s home cost programs, together with the Unified Funds Interface (UPI), already present quick, low-cost, and dependable digital funds, he mentioned. In distinction, stablecoins are largely confined to facilitating buying and selling and leverage inside the crypto market itself.
Authorized standing of crypto in India
In India, cryptocurrencies will not be recognised as authorized tender and proceed to function outdoors any particular regulatory framework. Though individuals are permitted to purchase, promote, and maintain crypto belongings, such transactions appeal to steep taxes, reflecting the federal government’s effort to restrict their unfold with out imposing an outright ban.
Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has reiterated that non-public cryptocurrencies shouldn’t have the federal government’s backing, saying they lack each sovereign assist and any tangible underlying belongings.
RBI pushes CBDC different
The Authorities of India and the Reserve Financial institution of India are as a substitute specializing in a central financial institution digital foreign money (CBDC) as a safer possibility, with the digital rupee — backed by the sovereign, aimed toward delivering the comfort of digital funds whereas preserving financial stability.
The RBI started pilot trials of its CBDC round three years in the past, in step with related initiatives undertaken by different central banks globally.
World distinction and continued warning
Sankar mentioned sovereign currencies derive their power from the backing of central banks worldwide and establishments such because the Worldwide Financial Fund (IMF), a assist system that offers them credibility, one thing personal digital tokens shouldn’t have.
He famous that though some international locations have adopted a extra permissive strategy — citing the USA, the place President Donald Trump has signed an government order inserting Bitcoin inside a reserve framework — Indian regulators stay cautious, pointing to the regular rise in crypto-related scams and fraud circumstances.
Reiterating the RBI’s place, Sankar mentioned cryptocurrencies neither operate as cash nor qualify as real monetary belongings, warning that their unchecked progress might pose severe dangers to financial and monetary stability.
Additionally Learn: India Cracks Down on Crypto Traders with 44,000 Tax Notices





