Rethinking Web3 Efficiency with Gear.exe

by
Victoria d’Este

Printed: March 21, 2025 at 12:37 pm Up to date: March 21, 2025 at 12:38 pm

by Ana

Edited and fact-checked:
March 21, 2025 at 12:37 pm

To enhance your local-language expertise, typically we make use of an auto-translation plugin. Please observe auto-translation might not be correct, so learn original article for exact data.

Scaling and effectivity are main challenges in Web3, and Gear.exe is tackling them head-on. To study extra, we spoke with Luis Ramírez, Head of DevRel at Gear Foundation, about how their decentralized compute community is bettering Ethereum’s efficiency whereas avoiding fragmentation.

On this interview, Luis explains how Gear.exe allows seamless scalability and discusses its distinctive reverse fuel mannequin. He additionally touches on the way forward for blockchain, AI, and what’s subsequent for Gear.exe.

Are you able to share your journey to Web3?

I’m at the moment the pinnacle of the World Vast Internet Basis, and my background is primarily technical. I’ve been working in IT for 20 years. I began as a developer and based my very own firm 10 years in the past to create varied merchandise. Like nearly everybody, I started in Web2 as a result of Web3 remains to be comparatively new.

Throughout my journey with my firm, I built-in totally different applied sciences. In 2013, I began accepting Bitcoin as cost for my growth providers, however nothing vital occurred again then because it wasn’t the very best time for Bitcoin. Later, in 2017, I started creating sensible contracts on Ethereum. From that time on, I transitioned to blockchain know-how.

In 2019, a Russian pal launched me to Rust and blockchain, and later, he invited me to be a part of Gear. I’ve now been working with Gear for 3 and a half years. My background is usually targeted on growth, rising developer communities, and strategic initiatives throughout totally different areas the place the Gear Basis has an official presence. At the moment, now we have groups within the US, Mexico, Spain, India, China, and different components of the world.

Ethereum has been going through rising challenges, akin to excessive latency and restricted computational energy. How does Gear.exe deal with these points? How does it examine to Layer 2 options?

Gear.exe is a decentralized compute community, and we give attention to fixing Ethereum’s computational challenges. We’re utilizing know-how already confirmed in Vara, akin to WebAssembly, the Actor Mannequin, and Persistent Reminiscence. These applied sciences enable us to scale purposes within the Web3 area securely whereas using frameworks and programming languages like Rust.

We transferred this know-how to Gear.exe to unravel Ethereum’s scalability points. Nonetheless, Gear.exe shouldn’t be a blockchain—it’s a decentralized compute community. This distinction is necessary as a result of whereas Layer 2 options clear up scalability points, additionally they introduce fragmentation. Customers usually have to create new accounts, which fragments TVL and token balances. Gear.exe prevents this by permitting builders to work together with our community by way of an API whereas sustaining compatibility with Ethereum infrastructure.

Fragmentation of liquidity and knowledge has been a persistent concern for Ethereum. Gear.exe claims to get rid of fragmentation. How does it obtain this whereas sustaining scalability?

Although Gear.exe shouldn’t be a blockchain, we use some blockchain-based applied sciences. For instance, we validate knowledge, however we don’t retailer consumer accounts. This implies no extra consumer knowledge is created, no new accounts are required, and liquidity stays completely inside Ethereum.

Our system solely processes computational requests and returns the outcomes to Ethereum inside the identical block. Different applied sciences can obtain related outcomes, however usually in several blocks, which introduces delays. Relying on the computation required, we guarantee excessive scalability. Our platform is suitable with WebAssembly, and sensible contracts are interpreted by a WebAssembly digital machine inside our nodes. This makes our resolution each quick and safe.

Gear.exe makes use of a reverse fuel mannequin, permitting apps to cowl consumer charges. How does this work in observe?

In conventional Web3 purposes, customers work together with a frontend however want a pockets and tokens to speak with the blockchain. This requirement could be a main barrier for adoption.

Gear.exe solves this with a reverse fuel mannequin. As a substitute of requiring customers to carry tokens for transactions, builders can prepay transaction charges utilizing a system referred to as vouchers. These vouchers are saved within the sensible contract, and any consumer interacting with the contract doesn’t have to fret about offering tokens or protecting fuel charges. This can be a highly effective characteristic that enhances usability and adoption.

Have you ever carried out efficiency benchmarks evaluating Gear.exe-enabled dApps to conventional Ethereum or roll-up-based dApps? In that case, what are the outcomes?

Sure, completely. We’ve revealed movies and articles detailing our benchmarking outcomes. We in contrast Gear.exe to Ethereum and Layer 2 options like Arbitrum, each its EVM and WebAssembly variations.

In comparison with Ethereum, Gear.exe is roughly 1,000 occasions quicker and considerably cheaper. In comparison with Arbitrum, Gear.exe is about 200 occasions extra cost-efficient. Even Arbitrum’s WebAssembly-compatible implementation—arguably the very best Layer 2 choice for Ethereum—can not match our efficiency, as we use Rust as a substitute of Solidity and have our personal sensible contract platform.

Given the continued challenges of excessive charges, community congestion, and centralization dangers in Layer 2 options, do you consider Ethereum will stay the dominant sensible contract platform, or will various architectures take the lead?

Different platforms like Solana are gaining traction, notably amongst builders. Nonetheless, lots of the most well-known use instances revolve round meme cash, since Web3 customers primarily give attention to monetary good points. Whereas know-how is essential, consumer conduct additionally performs a key position in adoption.

That stated, Ethereum nonetheless has the biggest developer group. We goal to draw builders by Gear.exe whereas remaining blockchain-agnostic. At the moment, Gear.exe is built-in with Ethereum’s Holesky testnet, however sooner or later, we plan to increase help for added networks.

Gear.exe leverages WebAssembly for effectivity. Do you see WebAssembly-based execution environments changing into the trade normal for next-generation blockchain platforms?

Sure, WebAssembly has considerably improved digital machine efficiency. Early sensible contract platforms relied on Ethereum’s EVM, however the transition to WebAssembly began with Gavin Wooden when he was creating Polkadot. Our CEO, Nikolay, was concerned in that shift from EVM to WebAssembly.

At present, WebAssembly has confirmed itself when it comes to each effectivity and safety. A number of blockchain platforms, together with Close to and a few Ethereum Layer 2 options like Arbitrum, are adopting WebAssembly. This means a rising pattern in direction of WebAssembly-based execution environments.

With the rising overlap between blockchain and AI, do you see Ethereum’s future tied to AI-driven sensible contracts and decentralized compute networks?

Completely. Although Ethereum is going through inner challenges inside its group, it stays the biggest ecosystem for builders. The intersection of AI and blockchain is already being explored, with a number of options constructed on Ethereum.

At the moment, AI computations will not be carried out immediately on Ethereum as a result of excessive prices. As a substitute, many options depend on off-chain processing. With Gear.exe, decentralized AI execution turns into possible, making AI-driven sensible contracts extra sensible. AI brokers are gaining traction, and this pattern will proceed rising.

Will improvements like Gear.exe’s reverse fuel mannequin be sufficient to make Web3 as seamless as Web2, or are greater infrastructural adjustments wanted?

I consider it’s not sufficient by itself. The reverse fuel mannequin is a vital step in making Web3 extra accessible, particularly for Web2 builders. Nonetheless, the Web3 ecosystem additionally wants new enterprise fashions that bridge Web2 and Web3. Adoption isn’t nearly infrastructure—it’s additionally about creating viable enterprise incentives.

Are you able to share the roadmap for Gear.exe?

At the moment, Gear.exe is working on the Holesky testnet. The crew is engaged on enhancements to reinforce compatibility, notably with the Vara community’s sensible contracts.

Our aim is to allow seamless migration of Vara sensible contracts to Gear.exe with none modifications. This can be a key a part of our roadmap. As soon as that is full, we plan to launch Gear.exe on the mainnet within the coming months.

Earlier than the mainnet launch, we’ll introduce a bridge between Gear.exe, Ethereum, and Vara, permitting seamless communication and token swaps between these networks.

About The Writer

Victoria is a author on quite a lot of know-how subjects together with Web3.0, AI and cryptocurrencies. Her intensive expertise permits her to jot down insightful articles for the broader viewers.

More articles

Victoria d’Este

•